The lecture will be given at University College London.
Please note that all ordinary meetings commence at 4:15pm. Members are welcome to come for tea at 3:45 pm.
All things prepositional: argument structure throughout the history of English
This paper investigates changes in prepositional argument structure in the history of English, viz. patterns featuring verb-attached prepositional phrases fulfilling various functions from prototypical adjuncts to complements. I use data from the Penn-Helsinki Corpora of Historical English, covering Middle, Early Modern, and Late Modern English (ca. 1150 to 1900) to assess the general hypothesis that PPs increased in frequency and expanded in functions over time as part of the general shift of English from a more synthetic to a more analytic language (e.g. Baugh & Cable 2002). I do so by zooming in on three particular case studies: (i) the development of prepositional verbs such as insist on, (ii) competition between PPs and NPs in the conative alternation, like in kick (at) the ball, and (iii) competition between PPs and NPs with time expressions as in (on) that day, we left. Overall, the results suggest that the history of English PPs is more complex than often presumed (e.g. Szmrecsyani 2016), and demonstrate an intricate interplay of cognitive factors like complexity and lexical biases in PP-diachrony (e.g. Levshina 2018; Pijpops et al. 2018).
References
Baugh, A. & T. Cable. 2002. A history of the English language, 5th edn. London: Routledge.
Levshina, N. 2018. Anybody (at) home? Communicative efficiency knocking on the Construction Grammar door. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 6, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2018-0004.
Pijpops, D., D. Speelman, S. Grondelaers & F. Van de Velde. 2018. Comparing explanations for the Complexity Principle. Language and Cognition 10(3), 514-543. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2018.13.
Szmrecsyani, B. 2016. An analytic-synthetic spiral in the history of English. In E. van Gelderen (ed.), Cyclical change continued, 93-112. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.227.04szm.
